This essay explores one of the most profound questions in Jewish mysticism: how deeply does the dialectical interaction between Chesed (loving-kindness) and Gevurah (judgment) penetrate into the very source of divine creativity the Ein Sof and the process of tzimtzum? Through examining classical Kabbalistic sources, Chabad thought as articulated by contemporary scholar Eli Rubin and the systematic teachings of Rabbi Shalom Dovber Schneersohn (the Rebbe Rashab), alongside heretical works including Veavo Hayom el HaAyin and Jonathan Eybeschutz’s radical theology, this study reveals fundamentally different approaches to understanding whether primordial creative urge itself contains essential tension or whether it emerges only with subsequent divine emanation. The analysis demonstrates that while classical Kabbalah preserves absolute unity of Ein Sof by locating dialectical tension in sefirotic emanation, Chabad thought intellectualizes this dialectic within divine cognition itself, and heretical traditions dare to locate fundamental tension within divine essence. These differences illuminate not merely theological positions but distinct approaches to understanding divine creativity, unity, and the emergence of multiplicity, with profound implications for contemporary therapeutic spirituality and post-Holocaust theology.
Keywords: Jewish mysticism, Kabbalah, Chesed, Gevurah, tzimtzum, divine dialectic, Ein Sof, sefirotic emanation, classical Kabbalah, Lurianic Kabbalah Chabad thought, divine consciousness, dialectical integration, Jonathan Eybeschutz, heretical traditions, mystical psychology
Citation: Ungar-Sargon, J. (2025). Chesed and Gevurah and the Tzimtzum—Between Mercy and Judgment in the Theology of Healing. J Psychol Neurosci; 7(3):1-12. DOI : https://doi.org/10.47485/2693-2490.1114